By NICK ABADJIAN & LIZ GOFF
It was the morning of what is typically the busiest travel day of the
year one day before Thanksgiving and as the military personnel patrolled the
airport with rifles slung over their shoulders, the airline check-ins had a low flow of
passengers and the parking lots had vast spans of empty spaces.

Port Authority Policemen armed with shotguns patrolled
LaGuardia Airport
the day before Thanksgiving,
what has in years past been the
busiest travel day of the year.
Tribune Photo by Ira Cohen
|
The Port Authority told the Queens Tribune that they estimated a 21
percent drop in the five-day Thanksgiving holiday travel this year over
last year. They estimated that their three airports would have one million passengers from
Wednesday through Sunday, with LaGuardia expected to receive 290,000 passengers, while JFK
is expected to have 330,000. Last year, LaGuardia had 383,000 and JFK had 422,000.
TWA Pilot Tom Hacker from Whitestone agreed that he had seen a decrease in
passengers on his flight. "Im not surprised with everything that happened.
People need time to recover," said Hacker. His flight coming back from Hawaii. The
767 was about three quarters full and his cockpit was outfitted with a bar to prevent
unwanted guests. Now he has to buzz in the flight attendants.
And the bar wasnt brimming with people at Hangars Food Sprits.
"Before we wanted to get away from the people," said bartender Josie Fernandez
about holiday rushes. "Now we have to wait for the crowd."
Bar patron and Texan Darren Schneider remarked, "This place is dead
in comparison. Theres nobody here." As an engineer that offers architectural
engineering instruction he has seen many airports traveling 80,000 miles a year.
On Nov. 21 he arrived early and found himself kicking back at the bar with
three hours to kill. "Last year during the holidays you couldnt walk through
the terminals," said Schneider.
Just after noon, lines began forming at the check-ins and one airport
employee explained that the rush of people come in waves . . . 9 a.m., 12 p.m. and 5 p.m.
after people finish work.

Camouflaged National Guardsmen are part of the new landscape
at Queens airports.
Tribune Photo by Ira Cohen |
And skycap Manual Vida at the central terminal said, "Its
packed, but not like before. This is the busiest its been since 9-11."
Since the attack Vida no longer checks in bags outside the terminal and
only helps people when they ask. "We live on tips," said Vida, explaining that
half the workforce of skycaps started looking for other jobs.
Ten-year old Fhibin Joseph, who attends PS 71 in Ridgewood, was a little
anxious to fly to Texas. Standing by supportive parents he said, "I want to go on but
Im really scared that something might happen to the engine."
Other passengers seemed less stressed like the Hylands from Sag Harbor who
were relaxing on electronic chair massagers. "Its pretty quiet," commented
Terri Hyland, as she was getting a back rub from a Brookstone chair. The Hylands were
waiting to board a Chicago bound flight to be with family.
"Its interesting to see the guys in camouflage," Hyland
added, but, "I cant say that Im comforted." She felt more confident
with the beefed up uniformed security, yet somehow inside she felt unsafe.
Reporting To The Borough Board |
Representatives of the Port Authority (PA) and the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) opened this weeks Borough Board meeting as
Borough President Claire Shulman asked some pointed questions about the safety of air
travel out of her borough.
JFK Airport General Manager Al Graser reported that starting Nov. 21,
National Guardsmen would also be covering the "frontages" as well as there being
two guardsmen at every screening area.

More flights were on time this week during a season known for
being plagued with delays.
Tribune Photo by Ira Cohen
|
FAA Eastern Division Security Manager Marcus Arroyo told Shulman and the Board
"were getting a lot of good intelligence" to assist in their
"security directives." He spoke of the difficult job that screeners do and said
that Guardsmen have gone through special training to be able to assist the screeners.
Councilman John Sabini told Arroyo that he had flown soon after the Guardsmen appeared
on the airport scene, and he asked if they werent just "eye candy."
"What are they trained to do," Sabini asked, smiling as he said that it
didnt seem their patrolling would add to air safety. "If I want to hijack the
terminal, thats a different story," Sabini said.
Arroyo responded that their presence is needed to "insure the proper operation of
the screening check point," and their training includes learning the job of the
screeners.
Shulman questioned the PA and the FAA about the citizenship requirements and
identification checks of airport workers. Although the federal Act signed into law this
week will require that the screeners be U.S. citizens, the PA representatives said that it
is not a requirement for the baggage handlers who load planes.
In response to the concerns of the Board, PA representative Patti Clark added that in
addition to the re-evaluation of all identification cards, the Authority is also looking
into technology that would make hand, face or eye scans the new identification method for
employees.
Shulman also expressed strong concern to the Arroyos report that only carry-on
luggage is being screened on domestic flights. Arroyo said that the airports are moving
toward having all stow-away luggage screened as well, but to date the technology has been
too slow in being distributed and too expensive to be in widespread use.
Under the Aviation Security Act signed by President
George W. Bush this week, the federal government will now hire and train 28,000 employees
to screen passengers and baggage at the nations airports. It will also put hundreds
of additional armed sky marshals on aircraft, require intelligence agencies to share
terrorist information with airport security heads, and allow pilots to carry guns (or stun
guns). All aircraft will also be required to comply with strict, new cockpit security
measures.
Congressman Joseph Crowley said the Act means "there will be
uniformity and protocol [for airport screening]. Right now, the protocol is different
depending on the airline."

During the next 12 months the federal government will control
airport security.
Tribune Photo by Ira Cohen
|
The bill also requires that all airport screeners be U. S. citizens
a move that would put "at least 65 percent" of current screeners out of a
job, experts said.
Aviation Security Association spokesman Kevin Quinn said he feels that the
government will eventually realize that many of the security breaches at passenger
checkpoints are caused by "human beings utilizing imperfect technology." Quinn
said the private companies will "remain on the sidelines" for the next three
years, working at overseas airports and other security areas. Then the companies will try
to persuade U.S. airports to rehire them, he said.
Crowley added that currently less than 10 percent of all luggage on
domestic flights are being screened. "The goal is to have 100 percent by 2002,"
he said.
Historically, security methods utilized at U.S. airports fail to detect 20
percent of dangerous objects that passengers sneak aboard airplanes hidden in
baggage, handbags, backpacks and pockets, FAA officials revealed this week.
Under the bill, all baggage will be screened for bombs and explosives, and
screeners will be fired if they fail to detect weapons and contraband at one of a series
of checkpoints.
US Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta said the new
security measures could carry a $2.6 billion price tag. Airlines will contribute from $700
million to $1 billion a year to defray the costs of the increased safety measures, he
said. The federal government will set the salaries of screeners, which will be more than
are now paid.
Mineta also said his agency would begin a search for the newly created
position of undersecretary. The selection process must be "heavily scrutinized,"
he said.
"We will put a great deal of responsibility for the safety of air
travelers in the hands of whoever is chosen to fill the position," Mineta said.
Passengers will be required to fork over $2.50 for each leg of a flight to
pay for the increased safety. The bill calls for a maximum additional fee of $5.00 for a
one-way flight.
In addition, Mineta said, the U.S. Department of Transportation is in the
process of developing a database that would allow airport security personnel to
cross-check names of passengers with those on "watch lists" compiled by federal,
state and local law enforcement agencies.
Tamara Hartman contributed to the story