|
Remember when you were in high school or
junior high and there were disputes between people?
Sometimes the confrontations were minor, other
times they may have been major.
Whether it may have involved you or others, there
were always people around who only seemed to choose sides after the
matter had been resolved one way or the other.
Most of the time these people were followers and
not leaders and later in life when we think about them – if at all
– it is generally in a bad or ambivalent light.
The rest of us learned about personal politics
later as adults and generally we have values regarding standing up for
the things we believe in sooner rather than later — especially if
the issue affects us directly.
Last week in Harlem there was a "late"
entry in the race against racism.
Michael Jackson stood up next to Al Sharpton and
called his boss Tommy Mattola a "racist"— actually using
an adjective that springs from the "devil."
I thought to myself "wow, this is rather
different for him."
He went on to say that he felt the record industry
sought to "destroy" artists of color by "stealing"
from them.
The so-called and self-proclaimed "King of
Pop" quoted examples of those who were abused by record companies
– like Sammy Davis Jr. and James Brown – and then went on to say
that if people stood up for him, they would stand up for all black
people in the music business.
Isn’t this the same guy who sang "it doesn’t
matter if you’re black or white?" Isn’t this the same guy who
had such a poor image of his own blackness that he whittled his nose
off, continues to straighten his hair and took some dangerous measures
to lighten his skin pigmentation not a little but a lot?
When he was selling two million records a week Mr.
Jackson should have gotten in the fight against racism.
I have long heard about allegations regarding Tommy
Mattola and his alleged love of using the N-word when talking about
black people.
That’s not news to me.
What also isn’t news is Jackson did or said
nothing when those allegations first surfaced.
I know that some might say that it is better late
than never to get into the fray and deal with what we have been
dealing with all of our lives.
I would say that would be true of most people, but
not Jackson.
If my house is burning down, I can understand if my
neighbor might be reluctant to help. But to deny that a fire even
exists and look the other way in that denial while the blaze consumes
everything and to only react when his house is in jeopardy would
guarantee only one thing. I would be looking for a new neighbor.
The record label racists have to be laughing their
backsides off anticipating a high profile fight with someone over the
issue of racism who is about as black as they are.
I have no doubt there are problems of the kind
Michael Jackson talked about at SONY music.
I heard from a source that the negative treatment
of people who are not Japanese or white spider-webs throughout the
entire organization.
Al Sharpton and Johnnie Cochran are certainly not
"Johnny come latelies" – please pardon the pun — to the
battle for equal rights in this arena or that.
But I believe that while involving Jackson may
motivate some white people who think he’s cool, it will not
legitimize the allegations of bias against the record business because
of Jackson’s lack of credibility.
At the risk of chewing on clichés, he should just
"Beat It" and if he’s serious about fighting racism, stay
where he’s been comfortable till now...the sidelines.
Gary Anthony Ramsay is a
weekend anchor
and journalist on the all-news
cable station NY1 and along-time resident of Queens. |